This situation has led to a constant schizophrenia, wherein a technocracy which sees no intrinsic value in lesser beings coexists with the other extreme, which sees no special value in human beings. But one cannot prescind from humanity. There can be no renewal of our relationship with nature without a renewal of humanity itself. There can be no ecology without an adequate anthropology. When the human person is considered as simply one being among others, the product of chance or physical determinism, then “our overall sense of responsibility wanes”. A misguided anthropocentrism need not necessarily yield to “biocentrism”, for that would entail adding yet another imbalance, failing to solve present problems and adding new ones. Human beings cannot be expected to feel responsibility for the world unless, at the same time, their unique capacities of knowledge, will, freedom and responsibility are recognized and valued.
top of page
Search
Recent Posts
See AllNeglecting to monitor the harm done to nature and the environmental impact of our decisions is only the most striking sign of a disregard...
940
Modernity has been marked by an excessive anthropocentrism which today, under another guise, continues to stand in the way of shared...
2280
Modern anthropocentrism has paradoxically ended up prizing technical thought over reality, since “the technological mind sees nature as...
680
bottom of page
Comments